Introducing standardized “readbacks” to improve patient safety in surgery: a prospective survey in 92 providers at a public safety-net hospital
© Prabhakar et al. 2012
Received: 7 February 2012
Accepted: 19 June 2012
Published: 19 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - julia neily|
|24 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Douglas Paull|
|30 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Bold|
|17 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Philip Stahel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-12-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.