Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Designing the ideal model for assessment of wound contamination after gunshot injuries: a comparative experimental study

  • Constantin von See1,
  • Majeed Rana1Email author,
  • Marcus Stoetzer1,
  • Horst Kokemueller1,
  • Martin Ruecker1 and
  • Nils-Claudius Gellrich1
Contributed equally
BMC Surgery201212:6

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-12-6

Received: 30 October 2011

Accepted: 10 April 2012

Published: 10 April 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
30 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Obaida Rana
16 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cyril Mauffrey
22 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Majeed Rana
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Majeed Rana
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Apr 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2482-12-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School