Designing the ideal model for assessment of wound contamination after gunshot injuries: a comparative experimental study
- Constantin von See†1,
- Majeed Rana†1Email author,
- Marcus Stoetzer1,
- Horst Kokemueller1,
- Martin Ruecker1 and
- Nils-Claudius Gellrich1
© von See et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 October 2011
Accepted: 10 April 2012
Published: 10 April 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Obaida Rana|
|16 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cyril Mauffrey|
|22 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Majeed Rana|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Majeed Rana|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|10 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-12-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.