Enhanced recovery in colorectal surgery: a multicentre study
© Ramírez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 7 October 2010
Accepted: 14 April 2011
Published: 14 April 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Sergio Maeso|
|20 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Schwenk|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kenneth Fearon|
|10 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Sergio Maeso|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|10 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Schwenk|
|24 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kenneth Fearon|
|8 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Sergio Maeso|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|8 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Apr 2011||Editorially accepted|
|14 Apr 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-11-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.