Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Potential hospital cost-savings attributed to improvements in outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery following self-audit

Contributed equally
BMC Surgery201010:4

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-10-4

Received: 28 August 2009

Accepted: 27 January 2010

Published: 27 January 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Aug 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Allan Spigelman
3 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cesare Hassan
18 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Watters
1 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Louisa Gordon
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cesare Hassan
24 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Louisa Gordon
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Jan 2010 Editorially accepted
27 Jan 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2482-10-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Genetics and Population Health Division, PO Royal Brisbane Hospital
(2)
Queensland University of Technology, School of Public Health
(3)
Department of Gynaecology and Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital

Advertisement