Potential hospital cost-savings attributed to improvements in outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery following self-audit
© Gordon and Obermair; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 28 August 2009
Accepted: 27 January 2010
Published: 27 January 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Aug 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allan Spigelman|
|3 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cesare Hassan|
|18 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Watters|
|1 Dec 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Louisa Gordon|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Dec 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cesare Hassan|
|24 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Louisa Gordon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jan 2010||Editorially accepted|
|27 Jan 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-10-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.