A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study)
© Reurings et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 15 October 2009
Accepted: 14 June 2010
Published: 14 June 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Oct 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Markus Buchler|
|6 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jurrian Reurings|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Markus Buchler|
|28 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jurrian Reurings|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jun 2010||Editorially accepted|
|14 Jun 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-10-18|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.